Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Daryl J. Bem is a social psychologist, and this article, published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, reports nine experiments Bem interpreted as evidence for precognition, the anomalous influence of a future event on present cognition. Its strength as a source is exactly what makes it significant, it passed peer review at a mainstream psychology journal, which is precisely why it became a landmark case that helped trigger the psychology field's replication crisis. Its limit is now well documented, subsequent large-scale replication attempts largely failed to reproduce Bem's results, and the episode is now widely cited as an example of how flexible statistical analysis can produce a false positive, so this source should be cited for what it claimed and its historical role, not as evidence precognition is real.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, a rigorously peer reviewed psychology journal, Daryl J. Bem's article, the strongest possible provenance for a peer reviewed article regardless of the later replication debate over its findings.
Notes
Bem's nine precognition experiments; became a landmark case in the psychology replication crisis.
Citation
Author
Daryl J. Bem
Publisher
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 100
Publication Year
2011
Source Type
peer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (29 claims)

This source backs 29 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Psi Phenomena, 6 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 2 holds, 2 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Studies, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Disciplines, 2 claims: 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.
  • Years, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.