Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Fiqh al-Zakah

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Fiqh al-Zakah is a modern jurist's own comprehensive treatment of zakat, Islamic almsgiving, and this record holds it plainly at the tier appropriate to one scholar's own partisan legal position rather than to neutral outside description: Yusuf al-Qaradawi wrote from within a specific tradition of Sunni jurisprudence, and this record states his positions here as his own stated fiqh rather than as a settled, universally accepted ruling. Use it to document what this specific modern jurist argues about the rules and scope of zakat; it is not evidence that his specific rulings represent the position of every school of Islamic law, since it is one jurist's own comprehensive statement of his own legal reasoning.

Facts
Citation
Author
Yusuf al-Qaradawi
Publisher
Scientific Publishing Centre, King Abdulaziz University
Publication Year
1969
URL
https://archive.org/details/fiqh-al-zakah-volume-2
Source Type
primary-text
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Yusuf al-Qaradawi's comprehensive modern treatment of zakat. A partisan work of Sunni jurisprudence, cited for the positions it states rather than as neutral outside description.
Notes
A modern jurist's comprehensive treatment of zakat. A partisan work of Sunni fiqh, cited for the positions it states rather than as neutral description.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Sunni, Denominations

This source names Sunni directly: "from within a specific tradition of Sunni jurisprudence, and this record states his positions here as his own stated fiqh rather than as a settled, universally accepted ruling."

Source Fiqh al-ZakahYusuf al-Qaradawi
Claims Backed By This Source (37 claims)

This source backs 37 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested. As cited relationships: 19 holds. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Schools of Religious Law, 23 claims: 18 holds, 5 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Practices, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.