Robert D. Crews's For Prophet and Tsar, Islam and Empire in Russia and Central Asia, published by Harvard University Press in 2006, is a scholarly history arguing that the Russian imperial state, rather than simply suppressing Islam among its Muslim subjects, actively incorporated Islamic religious institutions and clergy into its own administrative structure, governing indirectly through them. Crews draws on Russian and Central Asian archival sources to build the argument, a genuinely revisionist challenge to older accounts that framed Tsarist rule and Islam as straightforwardly opposed forces. Its strength is that archival grounding in the actual administrative record of how the empire managed religious affairs on the ground rather than only in official ideology. Its limit is that the book's argument centers the state's own administrative perspective, so a claim about how Muslim communities themselves experienced or resisted this incorporation, rather than how the state structured it, needs sources centering that community perspective directly.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Robert D. Crews's For Prophet and Tsar, published by Harvard University Press in 2006, is a peer reviewed scholarly history drawing on Russian and Central Asian archival sources, treated at the top tier. NotesRobert Crews's scholarly study of Islam and empire in Russia and Central Asia.
Citation
AuthorRobert D. Crews
PublisherHarvard University Press
Publication Year2006
Source Typebook
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Asia directly: "Islam and Empire in Russia and Central Asia, published by Harvard University Press in 2006, is a scholarly history arguing that the Russian imperial state, rather than simply suppressing Islam among..."
This source names Russia directly: "Crews's For Prophet and Tsar, Islam and Empire in Russia and Central Asia, published by Harvard University Press in 2006, is a scholarly history arguing that the Russian imperial state, rather than..."
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)
This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Empires & Polities, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Religious Orders, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.