Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Founder of Hasidism: A Quest for the Historical Ba'al Shem Tov

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Moshe Rosman is a historian of early modern Polish Jewry, and this University of California Press book is his archival study of Israel ben Eliezer, the Ba'al Shem Tov, separating what can actually be documented about the historical man from the extensive hagiographic tradition that grew up around him within Hasidism. Its strength is genuine archival discovery, Rosman located and used Polish civic and legal records that let him establish concrete facts about the Ba'al Shem Tov's life independent of the later devotional stories, a real methodological advance over sources that worked only from the hagiography itself. Its limit is that, precisely because so little documentary evidence survives, large parts of the Ba'al Shem Tov's inner religious life and teaching remain accessible mainly through the hagiographic tradition this book is explicitly working to distinguish from established fact.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Moshe Rosman's archival study separating the documented historical Israel ben Eliezer, the Baal Shem Tov, from the later hagiographic tradition around him.
Notes
Archival study separating the documented Israel ben Eliezer from the hagiographic tradition.
Citation
Author
Moshe Rosman
Publisher
University of California Press
Publication Year
1996
Source Type
academic biography
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Baal, Deities

This source names Baal directly: "Moshe Rosman is a historian of early modern Polish Jewry, and this University of California Press book is his archival study of Israel ben Eliezer, the Ba'al Shem Tov, separating what can actually..."

Israel, Countries

This source names Israel directly: "Press book is his archival study of Israel ben Eliezer, the Ba'al Shem Tov, separating what can actually be documented about the historical man from the extensive hagiographic tradition that grew up..."

Claims Backed By This Source (43 claims)

This source backs 43 claims across the atlas. As facts: 23 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 9 holds, 1 critiqued Here. Plus 9 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Historical Figures, 13 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Denominations, 9 claims: 4 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Cultures, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Historical Figures

Critiqued Here

1

Denominations

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.