James Lovelock's Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth is the founding statement of the Gaia hypothesis, published by Oxford University Press, proposing that Earth's biosphere, atmosphere and oceans function as a single self regulating system. Lovelock was a working scientist, and the book presents Gaia as an earth system science proposal grounded in atmospheric chemistry, not as a religious or spiritual claim, though it has since been widely taken up in exactly that spiritual sense by movements outside the scientific literature that produced it. Its authority rests on its recognized founding role in earth system science, later developed further by Lovelock and Lynn Margulis. Its limit is that the strong original version of the hypothesis, implying deliberate planetary self regulation, has been refined by subsequent scientific debate into a more modest systems account, so a claim resting on the book's strongest original language should be checked against that later scientific discussion.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
James Lovelock's Gaia, published by Oxford University Press, is treated at the top tier as the founding scientific statement of the Gaia hypothesis, its authority resting on its recognized founding role in earth system science, notwithstanding that the strong original version of the hypothesis has since been refined by later scientific debate. NotesThe founding statement of the Gaia hypothesis as an earth system science proposal.
Citation
AuthorJames E. Lovelock
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication Year1979
Source TypeBook (scholarly)
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Gaia, Deities This source names Gaia directly: "James Lovelock's Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth is the founding statement of the Gaia hypothesis, published by Oxford University Press, proposing that Earth's biosphere, atmosphere and oceans..."
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)
This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Doctrines, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.