Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

God of the Dao: Lord Lao in History and Myth

Livia Kohn's God of the Dao, Lord Lao in History and Myth, published by the University of Michigan Center for Chinese Studies in 1998, is a scholarly study tracing the deification of Laozi as Lord Lao across the history of Daoist religion, from his role as a sage philosopher in early texts to his standing as a major cosmic deity in later organized Daoism. Kohn is a specialist in Daoist studies working from the primary Daoist textual corpus across a very long historical span. Its strength is that comprehensive, primary source based tracing of a single figure's religious development over roughly two millennia. Its limit is the scale of that span itself: compressing so long and regionally varied a development means individual local or sectarian variations in how Lord Lao was understood receive less depth than a narrower, period specific study could offer.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Livia Kohn's God of the Dao, Lord Lao in History and Myth, published by the University of Michigan Center for Chinese Studies in 1998, is a peer reviewed scholarly study by a specialist in Daoist studies, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Livia Kohn's scholarly study of Lord Lao in Daoist history and myth.
Citation
Author
Livia Kohn
Publisher
University of Michigan Center for Chinese Studies
Publication Year
1998
Source Type
academic monograph
Connections

Associated With

Laozi, Figures

This source names Laozi directly: "study tracing the deification of Laozi as Lord Lao across the history of Daoist religion, from his role as a sage philosopher in early texts to his standing as a major cosmic deity in later..."

Source God of the Dao: Lord Lao in History and MythLivia Kohn
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)

This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Figures, 7 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
  • Deities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.