Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Switch Atlas

Source

Harriet Beecher Stowe (Wikipedia)

source

Wikipedia's dedicated article on Harriet Beecher Stowe, stating she was the daughter of Congregationalist minister Lyman Beecher and that her husband Calvin Ellis Stowe, whom she met at Lane Theological Seminary, was a clergyman and biblical scholar. Corroborates the Brunswick, Maine church vision as the traditionally cited inspiration for Uncle Tom's Cabin. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Tier three, general reference encyclopedia entry, matching this database's established convention for Wikipedia citations. Used for plain biographical facts, her father's Congregationalist pastorate and her husband's clerical training, both widely corroborated elsewhere.
Citation
Publisher
Wikipedia
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_Beecher_Stowe
Source Type
reference-database
Connections

Associated With

Congregationalists, Denominations

This source names Congregationalists directly: "Wikipedia's dedicated article on Harriet Beecher Stowe, stating she was the daughter of Congregationalist minister Lyman Beecher and that her husband Calvin Ellis Stowe, whom she met at Lane..."

Source Harriet Beecher Stowe (Wikipedia)
Maine, States & Territories

This source names Maine directly: "Corroborates the Brunswick, Maine church vision as the traditionally cited inspiration for Uncle Tom's Cabin."

Source Harriet Beecher Stowe (Wikipedia)
Claims Backed By This Source (22 claims)

This source backs 22 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Historical Figures, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Literary Works, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.