Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Hermetica: The Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Brian Copenhaver's translation is the standard critical scholarly edition of the Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius, prepared with the philological and historical apparatus that made it the reference point for dating and characterizing these Hermetic writings, working directly from the Greek and Latin texts rather than from a devotional or popular retelling. That direct critical translation method, checkable against the source texts, is the edition's real evidentiary basis. Use it for the content of the Hermetic writings and their scholarly dating and character as this critical edition establishes them; a claim about a later esoteric tradition's own reading or use of Hermetic ideas needs a source addressing that later reception directly, since this edition is focused on the ancient texts themselves.

Facts
Citation
Author
Brian P. Copenhaver
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Publication Year
1992
URL
https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/literature/anglo-saxon-and-medieval-literature/hermetica-greek-corpus-hermeticum-and-latin-asclepius-new-english-translation-notes-and-introduction
Source Type
Critical translation with scholarly introduction
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Brian Copenhaver's standard critical scholarly translation of the Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius, prepared with the philological apparatus that made it the reference point for dating and characterizing the Hermetic writings, worked directly from the Greek and Latin texts.
Notes
Standard critical translation with introduction; the reference for the dating and character of the Hermetic writings.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Asclepius, Deities

This source names Asclepius directly: "Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius, prepared with the philological and historical apparatus that made it the reference point for dating and characterizing these Hermetic writings..."

Claims Backed By This Source (144 claims)

This source backs 144 claims across the atlas. As facts: 111 well-attested, 3 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 7 holds. Plus 23 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 36 claims: 27 well-attested, 4 holds, 5 general references.
  • Hermetic Principles, 28 claims: 18 well-attested, 3 popular myth - corrected, 7 general references.
  • Articles, 25 claims: 23 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Religions, 15 claims: 13 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Subcategories, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Prayers, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 3 general references.
  • Esoteric Texts, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 3 general references.

Popular myth - corrected

3

Hermetic Principles

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.