Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Hymns and Sacred Poems, 1739 (Hymnology Archive and Wikipedia)

source

A combined citation covering the Hymnology Archive's catalogue entry for the Wesleys' published works and the Wikipedia articles on Hymns and Sacred Poems (1739), And Can It Be and Charles Wesley. Its strength is corroborated bibliographic detail (printer, date, contents, edition history) drawn from primary catalogue and archival description. Its limit is that a claim about the Wesleys' own theological intentions in compiling the collection needs a source examining their correspondence and preaching directly, not a bibliographic catalogue entry.

Facts
Citation
Author
Hymnology Archive and Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Hymnology Archive and Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://www.hymnologyarchive.com/charles-john-wesley-works
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Both the Hymnology Archive and Wikipedia are tertiary reference sources, useful for verifiable factual detail on hymn publication history but neither an authored monograph nor peer reviewed scholarship, hence the tradition's-own-account tier this corpus already gives a bare Wikipedia citation.
Connections

Associated With

John Wesley, Figures

This source names John Wesley directly: "Archive's catalogue entry for the Wesleys' published works and the Wikipedia articles on Hymns and Sacred Poems (1739), And Can It Be and Charles Wesley."

Source Hymns and Sacred Poems, 1739 (Hymnology Archive and Wikipedia)Hymnology Archive and Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (30 claims)

This source backs 30 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Musical Works, 14 claims: 9 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.