Margaret E. Kenna's Icons in Theory and Practice, An Orthodox Christian Example, published in History of Religions, volume 24, by the University of Chicago Press in 1985, is an anthropological study of Greek Orthodox icon devotion built on Kenna's own fieldwork on a small Greek island and among island migrants in Athens, examining tamata, the small metal votive plaques offered to icons, alongside the formal theology of icon veneration. Its strength is that it pairs the Church's own doctrinal account of what an icon does with what Kenna actually observed ordinary devotees doing, a combination that a purely theological or purely ethnographic study on its own would miss. Its limit is that it is grounded in one island community's practice in a particular period, so a claim about Orthodox icon devotion generally, across the wider Greek or the broader Orthodox world, needs a source with that wider scope rather than this single community study.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published in History of Religions by the University of Chicago Press, Margaret E. Kenna's peer reviewed anthropological study built on her own fieldwork, peer reviewed university-level scholarship. NotesAnthropological study of Greek Orthodox icon devotion, including tamata votive plaques.
Citation
AuthorMargaret E. Kenna
PublisherHistory of Religions, vol. 24, no. 4, University of Chicago Press
Publication Year1985
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Athens, Cities This source names Athens directly: "island and among island migrants in Athens, examining tamata, the small metal votive plaques offered to icons, alongside the formal theology of icon veneration."
This source names Chicago directly: "volume 24, by the University of Chicago Press in 1985, is an anthropological study of Greek Orthodox icon devotion built on Kenna's own fieldwork on a small Greek island and among island migrants in..."
Claims Backed By This Source (29 claims)
This source backs 29 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Myths & Sacred Narratives, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Practices, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Well-attested
22Myths & Sacred Narratives
Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
Scholarly debate
1Myths & Sacred Narratives
Holds
3Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
General References
3Myths & Sacred Narratives
Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.