Frank Willett's Ife in the History of West African Sculpture, published by Thames and Hudson in 1967, is a scholarly study of the naturalistic bronze and terracotta sculptural tradition of Ife, the Yoruba holy city, written by an archaeologist who conducted excavation work at Ife himself. Its strength is that it is grounded in Willett's own fieldwork and remains a foundational reference in African art history for placing Ife sculpture within a documented archaeological sequence rather than treating it, as some earlier European writers had, as inexplicable without outside influence. Its limit is its age, nearly sixty years, during which further excavation and dating work has refined the chronology Willett proposed, so a precise date or attribution drawn from this source should be checked against more recent Ife archaeology rather than treated as the final word on a still active area of research.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published by Thames and Hudson in 1967, Frank Willett's own study grounded in the excavation work he personally conducted at Ife, a foundational reference in African art history, treated at the top tier. NotesScholarly study of Ife in the history of West African sculpture.
Citation
AuthorFrank Willett
PublisherThames and Hudson
Publication Year1967
Source TypeScholarly work
Connections
Associated With
This source names Franks directly: "Frank Willett's Ife in the History of West African Sculpture, published by Thames and Hudson in 1967, is a scholarly study of the naturalistic bronze and terracotta sculptural tradition of Ife, the..."
Source Ife in the History of West African SculptureFrank Willett
Claims Backed By This Source (27 claims)
This source backs 27 claims across the atlas. As facts: 18 well-attested. As cited relationships: 8 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Sites, 16 claims: 8 well-attested, 7 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.