The Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia's own institutional record is Mexico's national archaeology and history institute's standing custodial account of its founding, governance and its custody of major Mexica and Maya archaeological material. As the responsible government institution's own record, it is authoritative for provenance and custodial facts about the material it holds and administers, which is the fact this atlas cites it for. It is not a substitute for independent archaeological scholarship on the meaning or dating of any specific object in its care, which needs its own separate academic source.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Source-type government, precedent 21 of 22 tiered government-shaped rows are tier 1. NotesInstituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia's own custodial record for the object it holds. A standing institutional or private-holder record, not a scholarly publication; use for provenance and holding-institution facts, not for the object's own history or meaning.
Custodian
Custodian SourceYes
Custodian BodyInstituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia (INAH)
Custodian BasisThe institute's own account of its founding, governance and its custody of major Mexica and Maya archaeological material.
Citation
PublisherInstituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia (INAH)
URLhttps://www.inah.gob.mx/
Source Typegovernment
Connections
Associated With
Maya, Figures This source names Maya directly: "and its custody of major Mexica and Maya archaeological material."
Source Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia (institutional record)the holders' own account
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)
This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 10 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Custodians & Museums, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.