Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Invented Religions: Imagination, Fiction and Faith

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Carole M. Cusack is a professor of religious studies at the University of Sydney with no membership in Discordianism or any of the other deliberately invented religions the book examines, and it was published by an academic press specialising in religious studies monographs. It is treated in the study of new religious movements as a standard scholarly account of religions consciously created as fiction, including Discordianism, the Church of the SubGenius and Jediism, arguing that a religion's origin as a deliberate invention does not by itself settle whether its practitioners hold it sincerely. Cusack draws on Discordianism's own published Principia Discordia and on secondary accounts of its practitioners rather than reproducing the movement's own voice uncritically. This record has not independently traced a documented history of scholarly rebuttal to Cusack's specific claims. Use it for Discordianism's place among deliberately invented religions and the question of sincerity its own self presentation as a joke raises; use Adam Gorightly's insider history for the movement's detailed internal narrative.

Facts
Citation
Author
Carole M. Cusack
Publisher
Ashgate
Publication Year
2010
URL
https://archive.org/details/inventedreligion0000cusa
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Independent academic press monograph by a religious studies professor with no membership in Discordianism or any of the other invented religions the book examines.
Notes
Academic study of Discordianism and other deliberately invented religions.
Claims Backed By This Source (67 claims)

This source backs 67 claims across the atlas. As facts: 52 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 1 connected. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Scriptures & Texts, 13 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religions, 10 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 2 general references.
  • Articles, 9 claims: 9 well-attested.
  • Practices, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Open Questions, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Years, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.

Open question

1

Religions

Holds

3

Scriptures & Texts

Years

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.