Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Islam in China (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia

Wikipedia's article on Islam in China, community-edited. Reliable for the standard scholarly account that Muslim diplomats and merchants reached Tang China within a few decades of Islam's own founding, by both the Silk Road and maritime routes; the article itself names the traditional claim of a direct embassy by Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas in 616 to 618 as a later Chinese Muslim tradition rather than an independently verified event, and this atlas states both rather than adopting the legendary date. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_China
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Community-edited reference page, tier 3. Used for the documented 651 CE embassy to Emperor Gaozong; the earlier 616-618 tradition is named in the description as a later legendary claim, not adopted as the atom's own date.
Notes
Used for Islam's documented arrival in Tang China via Silk Road and maritime trade contact.
Connections

Associated With

China, Countries

This source names China directly: "Wikipedia's article on Islam in China, community-edited."

Source Islam in China (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (23 claims)

This source backs 23 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Spread Events, 8 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.