Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

The Jain Temple of Meguti (Archaeological Survey of India, Dharwad Circle)

Archaeological Survey of India, Dharwad Circle

The Archaeological Survey of India's Dharwad Circle, the government body responsible for the protected monuments of northern Karnataka, records that the Meguti Jain temple at Aihole was completed around 634 CE according to the inscription on its eastern wall, describes its pillared porch, divided antarala and sanctum surrounded by a circumambulatory passage, and identifies that inscription as the Aihole Prashasti composed by the Jain poet Ravikirti in praise of Chalukya emperor Pulikeshi II, containing the earliest epigraphical reference to the poets Kalidasa and Bharavi.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The Archaeological Survey of India's own regional circle record for a centrally protected monument, tier 1, matching the tier the map gives comparable national heritage institutional records, used here for the Meguti temple's 634 completion date and its identification as a Jain temple, corroborated by the Government of India's own published text of the Aihole inscription in Epigraphia Indica.
Citation
Publisher
Archaeological Survey of India, Dharwad Circle
URL
http://www.asidharwadcircle.in/monument/the-jain-temple-of-meguti/
Source Type
Heritage body
Connections

Associated With

Karnataka, Regions

This source names Karnataka directly: "the protected monuments of northern Karnataka, records that the Meguti Jain temple at Aihole was completed around 634 CE according to the inscription on its eastern wall, describes its pillared..."

Source The Jain Temple of Meguti (Archaeological Survey of India, Dharwad Circle)
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)

This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested. As cited relationships: 6 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Spread Events, 9 claims: 3 well-attested, 5 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.