The Metropolitan Museum of Art's own collection record for its Calcutta Art Studio lithograph diptych of Kali and Tara, the first of five sheets depicting the Ten Mahavidyas produced by the studio around 1885 to 1895, describing Kali at left and Tara at right, each with associated forms of Shiva.
Facts
Citation
PublisherThe Metropolitan Museum of Art
URLhttps://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/786756
Source TypeMuseum
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Tier two: the holding institution's own catalogue record, used here for the print's publisher, subject and place in the wider five-sheet series. Connections
Associated With
Kali, Deities This source names Kali directly: "Art Studio lithograph diptych of Kali and Tara, the first of five sheets depicting the Ten Mahavidyas produced by the studio around 1885 to 1895, describing Kali at left and Tara at right, each with..."
Source Diptych of Kali and Tara, Calcutta Art Studio (The Metropolitan Museum of Art)
Kali, Figures This source names Kali directly: "Art Studio lithograph diptych of Kali and Tara, the first of five sheets depicting the Ten Mahavidyas produced by the studio around 1885 to 1895, describing Kali at left and Tara at right, each with..."
Source Diptych of Kali and Tara, Calcutta Art Studio (The Metropolitan Museum of Art)
Tara, Deities This source names Tara directly: "Studio lithograph diptych of Kali and Tara, the first of five sheets depicting the Ten Mahavidyas produced by the studio around 1885 to 1895, describing Kali at left and Tara at right, each with..."
Source Diptych of Kali and Tara, Calcutta Art Studio (The Metropolitan Museum of Art)
Claims Backed By This Source (23 claims)
This source backs 23 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 9 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Art & Iconography, 15 claims: 8 well-attested, 6 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 3 holds.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.