Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Kamala and Bhairavi, The Metropolitan Museum of Art

source

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Metropolitan Museum of Art's own collection record for its Calcutta Art Studio lithograph diptych of Kamala and Bhairavi, naming the goddesses in Bengali, English and Hindi at the base of the sheet, describing Bhairavi seated on a lotus above water, wearing a skull garland alluding to her terrible nature as the fierce feminine counterpart of Bhairava, the destructive form of Shiva.

Facts
Citation
Publisher
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
URL
https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/688470
Source Type
Museum
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Tier two: the holding institution's own catalogue record, used here for the print's two subjects and their iconography.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Bengali, Languages

This source names Bengali directly: "and Bhairavi, naming the goddesses in Bengali, English and Hindi at the base of the sheet, describing Bhairavi seated on a lotus above water, wearing a skull garland alluding to her terrible nature..."

Bhairava, Deities

This source names Bhairava directly: "as the fierce feminine counterpart of Bhairava, the destructive form of Shiva."

Bhairavi, Deities

This source names Bhairavi directly: "lithograph diptych of Kamala and Bhairavi, naming the goddesses in Bengali, English and Hindi at the base of the sheet, describing Bhairavi seated on a lotus above water, wearing a skull garland..."

Hindi, Languages

This source names Hindi directly: "the goddesses in Bengali, English and Hindi at the base of the sheet, describing Bhairavi seated on a lotus above water, wearing a skull garland alluding to her terrible nature as the fierce..."

Kamala, Deities

This source names Kamala directly: "Art Studio lithograph diptych of Kamala and Bhairavi, naming the goddesses in Bengali, English and Hindi at the base of the sheet, describing Bhairavi seated on a lotus above water, wearing a skull..."

Claims Backed By This Source (24 claims)

This source backs 24 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 12 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 14 claims: 6 well-attested, 7 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 10 claims: 5 well-attested, 5 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.