Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Karen Horney, Daisetz T. Suzuki, and Zen Buddhism

Richard De Martino's Karen Horney, Daisetz T. Suzuki, and Zen Buddhism is a peer reviewed study, published in The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, of the documented intellectual exchange between the psychoanalyst Karen Horney and the Zen scholar D. T. Suzuki, examining how each engaged with the other's framework. De Martino himself participated in and studied that same circle of exchange between psychoanalysis and Zen in mid twentieth century America, giving the article a genuinely informed vantage point on its subject. As a peer reviewed article in a specialist psychoanalytic journal, it carries real authority for the specific documented exchange it examines. Its limit is scope, one particular intellectual relationship rather than a comprehensive history of psychoanalysis and Buddhism's wider mutual influence, which needs a broader dedicated source.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Reliability tier 1: a peer reviewed article in a specialist psychoanalytic journal, written by a participant in the very circle of exchange it examines.
Notes
Peer-reviewed study of the intellectual exchange between psychoanalyst Karen Horney, Zen scholar D. T. Suzuki and Zen Buddhism.
Citation
Author
Richard De Martino
Publisher
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis
Publication Year
1991
Source Type
Journal article
Connections

Associated With

Americas, Continents

This source names Americas directly: "Richard De Martino's Karen Horney, Daisetz T."

Source Karen Horney, Daisetz T. Suzuki, and Zen BuddhismRichard De Martino
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)

This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Historical Figures, 6 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 3 general references.
  • Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.