Wikipedia's article on Lady Frieda Harris, the artist who painted Aleister Crowley's Thoth Tarot deck, is a community edited reference page rather than a peer reviewed publication. It is reliable for standard biographical facts such as her artistic training and her collaboration with Crowley, and less reliable for evaluating the esoteric claims embedded in the deck's imagery. Use it for basic biography; a claim about the deck's symbolic system needs Crowley's own primary writings or a dedicated scholarly study of the Thoth Tarot. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Wikipedia's article on Lady Frieda Harris, the artist who painted Aleister Crowley's Thoth Tarot deck, the lower tier reflecting that a community edited reference page is reliable for standard biographical facts such as her artistic training and her collaboration with Crowley but less reliable for evaluating the esoteric claims embedded in the deck's imagery. NotesWikipedia's article on Lady Frieda Harris. A perpetually community-edited reference page rather than a peer-reviewed publication; use for standard, uncontroversial facts about Lady Frieda Harris (biographical detail, dates, common definitions), not as the source for a contested or specialist scholarly claim.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Frieda_Harris
Source Typereference
Connections
Associated With
Thoth, Deities This source names Thoth directly: "artist who painted Aleister Crowley's Thoth Tarot deck, is a community edited reference page rather than a peer reviewed publication."
Source Lady Frieda Harris (reference article)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)
This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Historical Figures, 12 claims: 8 well-attested, 4 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.