Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety (SCOTUSblog)

SCOTUSblog

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

SCOTUSblog's case file for Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety, docket 23 1197. Records that the Supreme Court, on 23 June 2026, decided the case by a 6 to 3 vote, holding that a state government employee may not be held liable in a personal capacity under a Spending Clause statute such as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 unless that employee has voluntarily and knowingly consented to answer private suits under it, so Damon Landor's case against the individual prison officials could not proceed. Names Justice Neil Gorsuch as the author of the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh and Barrett, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. States that oral argument was heard on 10 November 2025.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A dedicated legal publication's own case file tracking the Court's docket, argument and decision, tier 1 for a specialist record built directly from the Court's own filings and opinion, naming the exact vote, opinion author and holding.
Notes
Used for the docket number, the argument and decision dates, the 6 to 3 vote and its lineup, and the holding's exact wording.
Citation
Publisher
SCOTUSblog
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/landor-v-louisiana-department-of-corrections-and-public-safety/
Source Type
Case law
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Louisiana directly: "SCOTUSblog's case file for Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety, docket 23 1197."

Thomas, Figures

This source names Thomas directly: "by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh and Barrett, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan."

Claims Backed By This Source (22 claims)

This source backs 22 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Spread Events, 7 claims: 3 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.