Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Langdarma (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia

Wikipedia's article on Langdarma, community-edited. States the traditional Tibetan Buddhist account of his 841 to 842 reign as the Tibetan Empire's last unified king, the destruction of Nyingma monasteries and persecution of monks and nuns traditionally attributed to him, and his 842 assassination, credited by most sources to the monk Lhalung Pelgyi Dorje. It also names the modern historiographical dispute directly: reinterpretations published by historians, most prominently Zuiho Yamaguchi's "The Fiction of King Dar ma's Persecution of Buddhism," arguing the anti-Buddhist portrayal is a later chronicle tradition rather than a documented historical persecution. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Community-edited reference page, tier 3. Used because it is the source that carries BOTH the traditional persecution narrative and the named modern scholarly dispute against it (Yamaguchi), which is exactly the two-sided fact this event records; a source repeating only the traditional account would have been the wrong citation for it.
Notes
Used for Langdarma's reign dates, the traditional persecution narrative, and the modern historicity dispute against it.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langdarma
Source Type
reference
Connections

Associated With

Nyingma, Denominations

This source names Nyingma directly: "last unified king, the destruction of Nyingma monasteries and persecution of monks and nuns traditionally attributed to him, and his 842 assassination, credited by most sources to the monk Lhalung..."

Source Langdarma (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (24 claims)

This source backs 24 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Spread Events, 9 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.