Sources
Language of Flowers
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Kate Greenaway's Language of Flowers is a primary Victorian-era reference volume cataloging the sentimental meanings popularly assigned to flowers in nineteenth century England, illustrated by Greenaway herself. As a period artifact it is a genuine and often-cited record of how floriography was practiced and marketed to a Victorian readership, useful for dating and sourcing specific flower-meaning pairings back to their own era rather than to a later or invented tradition. It is not a scholarly history of floriography's origins or a comparative study across cultures, and the meanings it lists are Greenaway's own compilation from the genre's already-established Victorian conventions rather than an independently verified folk tradition, so it documents one popular codification rather than settling any single flower's meaning as authoritative.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Kate Greenaway's Language of Flowers, published by George Routledge and Sons, is a primary Victorian era reference volume rather than a modern scholarly history of floriography, hence the lower tier, though it is a genuine and often cited period artifact for how flower meanings were codified and marketed in nineteenth century England. NotesVictorian popular reference assigning symbolic meanings to flowers.
Citation
AuthorKate Greenaway
PublisherGeorge Routledge and Sons
Publication Year1884
Source TypePopular work
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)
This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Plants, 6 claims: 3 well-attested, 3 general references.
- Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.