This is Yuri Pines's Legalism in Chinese Philosophy entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, first published 10 December 2014 and substantively revised 7 April 2023, maintained by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University. As a peer-reviewed, continuously revised scholarly reference by a specialist in early Chinese statecraft thought it covers the Legalist tradition associated with figures such as Han Feizi and Shang Yang and its emphasis on law, statecraft and political control. Its strength is that Stanford Encyclopedia entries are written and periodically revised by recognized specialists under editorial oversight. Its limit is that it surveys the tradition broadly across multiple thinkers, so a claim needing close analysis of one Legalist figure's own text needs a source addressing that text directly.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Written by Yuri Pines, a specialist in early Chinese statecraft thought, for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, a signed, peer reviewed and continually revised specialist reference maintained by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University; a synthesizing survey entry rather than a full monograph, hence the middle tier. NotesFirst published 2014-12-10; substantive revision 2023-04-07. Verified live 2026-08-06.
Citation
AuthorYuri Pines
PublisherMetaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year2014
URLhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-legalism/
Source Typereference
Claims Backed By This Source (32 claims)
This source backs 32 claims across the atlas. As facts: 25 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 1 connected, 2 critiqued Here. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 11 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Philosophical Schools, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 critiqued Here, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Historical Periods, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.