Legend of the Crystal Skulls, by Jane MacLaren Walsh, published in Archaeology magazine by the Archaeological Institute of America in 2008, is a Smithsonian anthropologist's account of her scientific examination of the Mitchell-Hedges skull and related museum crystal skulls, including scanning electron microscopy of the tool marks left on their surfaces, concluding the marks are consistent with modern rotary tools rather than pre-Columbian craft techniques. Walsh conducted the physical examination herself as part of her Smithsonian curatorial work. Its strength is that direct forensic physical examination of the actual objects, rather than argument from style or provenance story alone, the strongest kind of evidence available for a manufacturing date question like this one. Its limit is that Walsh's findings address the specific skulls she examined, so a claim about a different crystal skull not covered in her study needs its own physical examination rather than an extrapolation from this one.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Jane MacLaren Walsh's Legend of the Crystal Skulls, published in Archaeology magazine by the Archaeological Institute of America, is written by a Smithsonian physical anthropologist who examined the skulls firsthand, the middle tier reflecting trade-magazine format rather than a peer reviewed journal article despite the author's direct specialist expertise. NotesSmithsonian anthropologist's account of the Mitchell-Hedges and museum skulls, incl. SEM microscopy of tool marks.
Citation
AuthorJane MacLaren Walsh
PublisherArchaeology (Archaeological Institute of America)
Publication Year2008
URLhttps://archive.archaeology.org/online/features/mitchell_hedges/microscope.html
Source Typemagazine
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Americas directly: "Legend of the Crystal Skulls, by Jane MacLaren Walsh, published in Archaeology magazine by the Archaeological Institute of America in 2008, is a Smithsonian anthropologist's account of her..."
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)
This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested, 2 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Artifacts & Relics, 4 claims: 2 popular myth - corrected, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Custodians & Museums, 4 claims: 3 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Popular myth - corrected
2Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.