Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Liễu Hạnh (Wikipedia)

source

Wikipedia's article on Lieu Hanh, the Vietnamese Mother Goddess venerated as the most prominent figure of Dao Mau, giving the founding dates and locations of her two earliest temples, Phu Van (1642) and Tien Huong (1643 to 1649), both in Van Cat village, Nam Dinh Province, a continuously revised, community edited tertiary encyclopedia entry with no named author or peer review process, hence the lower tier, though useful for these documented temple dates and the tradition's own account of her. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Reliability tier 3: a community edited encyclopedia article with citations, useful for uncontroversial documented facts, here the founding dates and locations of the Phu Van and Tien Huong temples, though not a substitute for dedicated scholarship on contested points.
Citation
Publisher
Wikipedia
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li%E1%BB%85u_H%E1%BA%A1nh
Source Type
reference
Connections

Associated With

Lieu Hanh, Deities

This source names Lieu Hanh directly: "Wikipedia's article on Lieu Hanh, the Vietnamese Mother Goddess venerated as the most prominent figure of Dao Mau, giving the founding dates and locations of her two earliest temples, Phu Van (1642)..."

Source Liễu Hạnh (Wikipedia)
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Sites, 8 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Deities, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.