Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Louangphrabang (Encyclopaedia Britannica)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is not independent scholarship; it is Encyclopaedia Britannica's own staff-written entry on Louangphrabang, one article inside the same continuously maintained project this atlas also records as a general source. It descends from that project rather than standing beside it, so citing this entry alongside the general Britannica record, or alongside another Britannica topic article, is one editorial voice, not corroboration. Use it for what this specific entry states about the royal city and the Phra Bang image that is the palladium of Laos; a claim needing deeper specialist history needs a dedicated academic source produced outside Britannica's own staff.

Facts
Citation
Author
Encyclopaedia Britannica
Publisher
Encyclopaedia Britannica
Publication Year
2023
URL
https://www.britannica.com/place/Louangphrabang
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Encyclopaedia Britannica's entry on Louangphrabang is written and edited in-house without an academic peer review process, the middle tier reflecting a professionally fact checked general reference rather than a specialist Southeast Asian history source.
Notes
Reference entry on the royal city named after the Phra Bang, the sacred Buddha image that is the palladium of Laos.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Laos, Countries

This source names Laos directly: "Bang image that is the palladium of Laos; a claim needing deeper specialist history needs a dedicated academic source produced outside Britannica's own staff."

Source Louangphrabang (Encyclopaedia Britannica)Encyclopaedia Britannica

Derived From

This record's own Author and Publisher fields name Encyclopaedia Britannica's own editorial staff, not an individual named scholar, for its entry on Louangphrabang; one article inside that same continuously maintained project, not a witness independent of it.

Source Louangphrabang (Encyclopaedia Britannica)Encyclopaedia Britannica
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)

This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 1 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 connected.
  • Figures, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Artifacts & Relics, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Custodians & Museums, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.

Well-attested

13

Artifacts & Relics

Custodians & Museums

Figures

General References

3

Artifacts & Relics

Custodians & Museums

Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.