Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Lucid dreaming verified by volitional communication during REM sleep

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Lucid dreaming verified by volitional communication during REM sleep, by Stephen LaBerge, Lynne Nagel, William Dement and Vincent Zarcone, published in Perceptual and Motor Skills volume 52 in 1981, is the study that first established lucid dreaming as an objectively verifiable physiological state rather than only a reported subjective experience, by having a sleeping subject signal a predetermined eye movement pattern, detectable on polygraph, at the moment they became aware they were dreaming. Its strength is the method itself, a signal that could be timestamped against the sleep laboratory's own recordings, converting a first person report into evidence a third party could check. Its limit is that the study establishes the timing and physiological reality of the state, not any claim about what a dreamer can achieve or perceive while lucid, so a claim about lucid dreaming's further uses rests on separate and later research, not on this founding demonstration.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
LaBerge, Nagel, Dement and Zarcone's study in Perceptual and Motor Skills, volume 52, 1981, is a peer reviewed journal article establishing lucid dreaming as an objectively verifiable physiological state by a checkable polygraph signal, treated at the top tier.
Notes
The experiment that established lucid dreaming as a verifiable state; cited here for the dating, not for any tradition's claims.
Citation
Author
Stephen LaBerge, Lynne Nagel, William Dement and Vincent Zarcone
Publisher
Perceptual and Motor Skills 52
Publication Year
1981
Source Type
Journal article
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)

This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 18 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Practices, 11 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.