The sourced Wikipedia article dedicated to this specific illuminated leaf, MIK III 4979, covering its Turfan excavation, its multilingual text in Sogdian, Turkic and Middle Persian written in Manichaean script, and the iconography of both its faces, including the four Hindu deities kneeling on the front and the Bema festival scene on the reverse. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Tier three: a collaboratively edited reference article, but one dedicated specifically to this single object rather than a general topic, used here for dating, dimensions and the iconography of both faces, corroborated by the custodian museum's own Turfan Collection page for the excavation context and holding institution. Citation
PublisherWikipedia
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaf_from_a_Manichaean_book_MIK_III_4979
Source Typeencyclopedia
Connections
Associated With
This source names Middle Persian directly: "text in Sogdian, Turkic and Middle Persian written in Manichaean script, and the iconography of both its faces, including the four Hindu deities kneeling on the front and the Bema festival scene on..."
Source Leaf from a Manichaean Book MIK III 4979, Wikipedia
This source names Sogdian directly: "excavation, its multilingual text in Sogdian, Turkic and Middle Persian written in Manichaean script, and the iconography of both its faces, including the four Hindu deities kneeling on the front..."
Source Leaf from a Manichaean Book MIK III 4979, Wikipedia
Claims Backed By This Source (24 claims)
This source backs 24 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 9 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Art & Iconography, 17 claims: 8 well-attested, 7 holds, 2 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.