Robert G. Jahn was a Princeton engineering professor and Brenda J. Dunne a psychologist, and this Harcourt Brace Jovanovich book is their own account of the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research program's random event generator and remote perception experiments, run at Princeton from 1979 to 2007. As the researchers' own report of their own program it is the correct source for what PEAR actually claimed to find and how it ran its trials, in their own words. Its limit is substantial and well documented in the wider scientific literature, PEAR's statistical methodology and its claimed small effect sizes drew sustained methodological criticism from other researchers who could not replicate the results under tighter controls, so a claim about whether the reported effects are real needs that independent critical literature alongside this self-report.
Facts
Citation
AuthorRobert G. Jahn, Brenda J. Dunne
PublisherHarcourt Brace Jovanovich
Publication Year1987
URLhttps://archive.org/details/marginsofreality0000jahn
Source TypeBook (practitioner)
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
The Princeton PEAR laboratory's own account of its random event generator and remote perception research program, the researchers' own report of their work rather than an independent assessment of it. NotesPEAR lab's own account of its random-event-generator and remote-perception program at Princeton, 1979-2007.
Claims Backed By This Source (40 claims)
This source backs 40 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 8 holds. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Psi Phenomena, 16 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 popular myth - corrected, 5 holds, 5 general references.
- Historical Figures, 11 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
- Studies, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
Popular myth - corrected
1Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.