The Wikipedia article on Marie Anne Lenormand is a community edited encyclopedic account of the French professional card reader active in Napoleonic era Paris, whose name was later attached, after her death, to the Lenormand oracle card system that bears little direct connection to any deck she is actually known to have used or designed herself. Its strength is that a well developed Wikipedia biography of a documented historical figure typically draws together period sources on her actual clientele and reputation, useful for the kind of stable biographical fact, dates, documented clients, contemporary reputation, that changes little between editors. Its limit is that Wikipedia is a continuously and anonymously editable reference rather than a peer reviewed biography, and the gap between the historical Lenormand and the later card system named for her is exactly the kind of contested attribution point where a specialist history of cartomancy, not an encyclopedia entry, should be the final word.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
The Wikipedia article on Marie Anne Lenormand is a community edited encyclopedic account with no named author or peer review process, hence the lower tier, though useful here for ordinary biographical facts. NotesWikipedia's article on Marie Anne Lenormand. A perpetually community-edited reference page rather than a peer-reviewed publication; use for standard, uncontroversial facts about Marie Anne Lenormand (biographical detail, dates, common definitions), not as the source for a contested or specialist scholarly claim.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Anne_Lenormand
Source Typereference
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Paris, Cities This source names Paris directly: "card reader active in Napoleonic era Paris, whose name was later attached, after her death, to the Lenormand oracle card system that bears little direct connection to any deck she is actually known..."
Claims Backed By This Source (21 claims)
This source backs 21 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Historical Figures, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
- Disciplines, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Tarot Spreads, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.