Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

How Much Is the Russian Orthodox Church Worth? (Meduza, 2016)

reporting the RBC investigation by Svetlana Reiter, Anastasia Napalkova and Ivan Golunov, Meduza, 24 February 2016

A Meduza feature reporting an RBC investigation by journalists Svetlana Reiter, Anastasia Napalkova and Ivan Golunov into the Russian Orthodox Church's commercial income, finding a 2014 untaxed profit figure but no total wealth figure, and stating that reliable data on how the Church spends its money does not exist.

Facts
Citation
Author
Svetlana Reiter, Anastasia Napalkova and Ivan Golunov (RBC investigation, reported by Meduza)
Publisher
Meduza, reporting an RBC investigation
Publication Year
2016
URL
https://meduza.io/en/feature/2016/02/24/how-much-is-the-russian-orthodox-church-worth
Source Type
journalism
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Tier 2: named investigative journalists' findings on a specific, dated figure (2014 untaxed commercial profit), the strongest documented number available precisely because the Church publishes no accounts; the investigation itself states plainly that no total wealth figure could be established.
Connections

Associated With

This source names Russian Orthodox directly: "Napalkova and Ivan Golunov into the Russian Orthodox Church's commercial income, finding a 2014 untaxed profit figure but no total wealth figure, and stating that reliable data on how the Church..."

Source How Much Is the Russian Orthodox Church Worth? (Meduza, 2016)Svetlana Reiter, Anastasia Napalkova and Ivan Golunov (RBC investigation, reported by Meduza)
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)

This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Denominations, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.