Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Messianism, Zionism, and Jewish Religious Radicalism

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Aviezer Ravitzky's Messianism, Zionism, and Jewish Religious Radicalism, published by the University of Chicago Press in 1996, is a scholarly study of messianic currents within modern Zionism and the religious radicalism they have sometimes produced. Ravitzky is an established scholar of Jewish thought. Its strength is that it is a peer-reviewed university press monograph widely cited as a standard account of the subject. Its limit is that Israeli religious and political movements have continued to develop since 1996, so a claim about the current state of religious Zionism needs a more recent source alongside this study.

Facts
Citation
Author
Aviezer Ravitzky
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
1996, Chicago Studies in the History of Judaism series, translated by Michael Swirsky and Jonathan Chipman; per the publisher's own catalogue and the AJS Review citation of the same edition.
Publication Year
1996
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Aviezer Ravitzky's Messianism, Zionism, and Jewish Religious Radicalism, published by the University of Chicago Press in 1996, is a standard peer reviewed scholarly study by a leading scholar of Jewish political thought, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Scholarly study of messianic thought, Zionism and religious radicalism in modern Judaism.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Chicago, Cities

This source names Chicago directly: "published by the University of Chicago Press in 1996, is a scholarly study of messianic currents within modern Zionism and the religious radicalism they have sometimes produced."

Claims Backed By This Source (22 claims)

This source backs 22 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Doctrines, 12 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 3 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.