Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Statue of Anubis as a Recumbent Canid, accession 69.105 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)

Metropolitan Museum of Art open-access collection API record, read 2026-08-18

The Metropolitan Museum of Art's own open-access collection API record for a limestone statue of Anubis as a recumbent canid, originally painted black, Egyptian, end of Late Period to Ptolemaic Period, 343 to 30 BCE. The record's own title names Anubis directly and its Getty AAT and Wikidata linked tag confirms the identification. Adelaide Milton de Groot Fund, in memory of the de Groot and Hawley families, 1969. Accession number 69.105.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The holding museum's own open-access collection API record for the accessioned object, the strongest available record for its title, medium and accession number, whose own controlled-vocabulary tag confirms the identification named in the title.
Citation
Publisher
Metropolitan Museum of Art
URL
https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/544075
Source Type
Museum
Connections

Associated With

Anubis, Deities

This source names Anubis directly: "API record for a limestone statue of Anubis as a recumbent canid, originally painted black, Egyptian, end of Late Period to Ptolemaic Period, 343 to 30 BCE."

Source Statue of Anubis as a Recumbent Canid, accession 69.105 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)
Anubis, Figures

This source names Anubis directly: "API record for a limestone statue of Anubis as a recumbent canid, originally painted black, Egyptian, end of Late Period to Ptolemaic Period, 343 to 30 BCE."

Source Statue of Anubis as a Recumbent Canid, accession 69.105 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)
Claims Backed By This Source (29 claims)

This source backs 29 claims across the atlas. As facts: 21 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 22 claims: 16 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.