Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Taweret, accession 26.7.887 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)

Metropolitan Museum of Art open-access collection API record, read 2026-08-28

The Metropolitan Museum of Art's own open-access collection API record for Taweret, accession 26.7.887, in the Egyptian Art department. Read as part of a 2026-08-28 divinity depth pass filling artwork entities the atlas had minted with a description and cross-references but no properties of their own.

Facts
Citation
Publisher
Metropolitan Museum of Art
URL
https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/551328
Source Type
Museum
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The holding museum's own open-access collection API record for the accessioned figurine, the strongest available record for its provenance, date and accession number, whose own title is the goddess's own name.
Connections

Associated With

Taweret, Deities

This source names Taweret directly: "open-access collection API record for "Taweret," a faience figurine of the Ptolemaic Period, 332 to 30 BCE, believed to originate from the Qau District in Upper Egypt."

Source Taweret, accession 26.7.887 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)
Sources
Taweret, accession 26.7.887 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)
Metropolitan Museum of ArtView the Source

Cite this page as it read on 08/28/2026 07:39:19 AM: /cite/59

Claims Backed By This Source (27 claims)

This source backs 27 claims across the atlas. As facts: 21 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 21 claims: 16 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds.
Version History (1)

This entry has 1 recorded version.

Description

Version 1 · 08/28/2026 07:39:19 AM · Cite This Version

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.