The Metropolitan Museum of Art's own open-access collection API record for The Bodhisattva Vajrapani, accession 2015.500.4.9, in the Asian Art department. Read as part of a 2026-08-28 divinity depth pass filling artwork entities the atlas had minted with a description and cross-references but no properties of their own.
Facts
Citation
PublisherMetropolitan Museum of Art
URLhttps://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/38559
Source TypeMuseum
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
The holding museum's own open-access collection API record for the accessioned stele, the strongest available record for its provenance, date and accession number, whose own title names the subject outright. Connections
Associated With
Bihar, Regions This source names Bihar directly: "a sandstone stele from Eastern India, Bihar, probably Nalanda, 7th to early 8th century."
Source The Bodhisattva Vajrapani, accession 2015.500.4.9 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)
This source names Nalanda directly: "from Eastern India, Bihar, probably Nalanda, 7th to early 8th century."
Source The Bodhisattva Vajrapani, accession 2015.500.4.9 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)
This source names Vajrapani directly: "API record for "The Bodhisattva Vajrapani," a sandstone stele from Eastern India, Bihar, probably Nalanda, 7th to early 8th century."
Source The Bodhisattva Vajrapani, accession 2015.500.4.9 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)
Sources
The Bodhisattva Vajrapani, accession 2015.500.4.9 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)
Cite this page as it read on 08/28/2026 07:39:17 AM: /cite/58
Claims Backed By This Source (32 claims)
This source backs 32 claims across the atlas. As facts: 21 well-attested. As cited relationships: 8 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sacred Art & Iconography, 24 claims: 16 well-attested, 5 holds, 1 connected, 2 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 3 holds.
Version History (1)
This entry has 1 recorded version.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.