Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Rama and Lakshmana as Boys Assist the Sage Vishvamitra, accession 1976.14 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)

Metropolitan Museum of Art open-access collection API record, read 2026-08-18

The Metropolitan Museum of Art's own open-access collection API record for "Rama and Lakshmana as Boys Assist the Sage Vishvamitra: Folio from a dispersed Ramayana series," a folio from the workshop of Nainsukh, India, Punjab Hills, kingdom of Kangra, ca. 1780. The record's own title names the subject outright. Seymour Fund, 1976. Accession number 1976.14.

Facts
Citation
Publisher
Metropolitan Museum of Art
URL
https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/37956
Source Type
Museum
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The holding museum's own open-access collection API record for the accessioned folio, the strongest available record for its workshop, culture, date and accession number, whose own title names the subject outright.
Connections

Associated With

Lakshmana, Figures

This source names Lakshmana directly: "collection API record for "Rama and Lakshmana as Boys Assist the Sage Vishvamitra: Folio from a dispersed Ramayana series," a folio from the workshop of Nainsukh, India, Punjab Hills, kingdom of..."

Source Rama and Lakshmana as Boys Assist the Sage Vishvamitra, accession 1976.14 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)
Vishvamitra, Figures

This source names Vishvamitra directly: "and Lakshmana as Boys Assist the Sage Vishvamitra: Folio from a dispersed Ramayana series," a folio from the workshop of Nainsukh, India, Punjab Hills, kingdom of Kangra, ca."

Source Rama and Lakshmana as Boys Assist the Sage Vishvamitra, accession 1976.14 (Metropolitan Museum of Art)
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)

This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sacred Art & Iconography, 11 claims: 5 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 connected, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.