Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Mirror of Auras: Chen Tuan on Physiognomy

Livia Kohn is a scholar of Taoism, and this is her peer reviewed article, published in the journal Asian Folklore Studies, examining the Mirror of Auras, a physiognomy manual traditionally attributed to the tenth century Taoist figure Chen Tuan, alongside the wider debate over which physiognomic texts can actually be credited to him. Its strength is careful textual and attributional scholarship, Kohn treats Chen Tuan's authorship as a genuine historical question to be argued rather than assumed, examining the manuscript and attribution evidence directly. Its limit is that it is a focused article on this one text and this one attribution question, so a claim about Chinese physiognomy or face reading practice more broadly, beyond what this specific manual and its contested authorship can support, needs a wider source on the tradition as a whole.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A peer reviewed journal article from Asian Folklore Studies, published by the Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture, on the tenth century Taoist Chen Tuan and the origins of Chinese physiognomy.
Notes
Asian Folklore Studies, vol. 47, no. 2, 1988, pp. 215 to 256. Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture, Nagoya. Covers Chen Tuan, the tenth century Taoist credited as a founder of Chinese physiognomy and traditionally taught by the legendary Hemp Robed Master, Ma Yi.
Citation
Author
Livia Kohn
Publisher
Asian Folklore Studies
Publication Year
1988
URL
https://asianethnology.org/article/148681.pdf
Source Type
Journal article
Connections

Associated With

Chen Tuan, Figures

This source names Chen Tuan directly: "to the tenth century Taoist figure Chen Tuan, alongside the wider debate over which physiognomic texts can actually be credited to him."

Source Mirror of Auras: Chen Tuan on PhysiognomyLivia Kohn
Claims Backed By This Source (59 claims)

This source backs 59 claims across the atlas. As facts: 43 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 5 connected. Plus 10 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Face Regions, 30 claims: 20 well-attested, 5 connected, 5 general references.
  • Articles, 20 claims: 15 well-attested, 5 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.