Jonathan A. C. Brown's Misquoting Muhammad is a scholarly work aimed at a broad educated readership, examining how hadith, the reports of the Prophet Muhammad's sayings and actions, have been interpreted, contested and sometimes misused across Islamic history and into the modern period, written by a specialist in hadith studies and Islamic law. Its authority rests on Brown's close command of the classical hadith-critical tradition itself, which he presents as a sophisticated internal Muslim scholarly discipline rather than a modern Western import. Because the book engages contemporary controversies, including modern reformist and extremist uses of hadith, some of its specific interpretive judgments on those live debates have themselves drawn discussion from scholars and general readers who weigh the underlying sources differently than Brown does.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Jonathan A. C. Brown's Misquoting Muhammad, published by Oneworld, is a scholarly work by a specialist in hadith studies and Islamic law aimed at a broad educated readership, treated at the top tier on the strength of Brown's close command of the classical hadith critical tradition, notwithstanding that some of his specific judgments on live contemporary controversies have themselves drawn discussion from other scholars. NotesScholarly survey of the interpretation, contestation and use of hadith in Islamic thought.
Citation
AuthorJonathan A. C. Brown
PublisherOneworld
Publication Year2014
Source TypeScholarly work
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Muhammad directly: "Jonathan A. C. Brown's Misquoting Muhammad is a scholarly work aimed at a broad educated"
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)
This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Doctrines, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
- Practices, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.