Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Mohism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is Chris Fraser's Mohism entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, first published 21 October 2002 and substantively revised 1 September 2024, maintained by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University. As a peer-reviewed, continuously revised scholarly reference by a specialist in early Chinese philosophy it covers the Mohist school founded by Mozi, its consequentialist ethics and its distinctive logical and epistemological doctrines. Its strength is that Stanford Encyclopedia entries are written and periodically revised by recognized specialists under editorial oversight, unlike a general encyclopedia. Its limit is that it surveys Mohism as a whole school of thought, so a claim needing close textual analysis of one specific Mohist text needs a source engaging that text directly.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Chris Fraser's Mohism entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, first published in 2002 and continuously revised under the encyclopedia's own editorial board, an authored and reviewed reference rather than independent peer-reviewed monograph scholarship, hence the middle tier.
Notes
First published 2002-10-21; substantive revision 2024-09-01. Verified live 2026-08-06.
Citation
Author
Chris Fraser
Publisher
Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year
2002
URL
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mohism/
Source Type
reference
Claims Backed By This Source (30 claims)

This source backs 30 claims across the atlas. As facts: 25 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 connected, 1 critiqued Here. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 13 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 connected, 2 general references.
  • Philosophical Schools, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 critiqued Here, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.