David N. Gellner is an anthropologist, and this Cambridge University Press book is his scholarly study of Newar Buddhism's hierarchy of ritual specialists, examining how monastic, householder and tantric priestly roles are organized within this distinctive Buddhist tradition of the Kathmandu Valley. Its strength is that Gellner combines textual and ethnographic method to document a ritual hierarchy that differs substantially from the monastic-only model often assumed to be standard Buddhism, correcting that assumption with direct evidence. Its limit is that it centers on Newar Buddhism specifically, so a claim generalizing to Tibetan or Theravada monastic and priestly structures needs a source addressing those separate traditions.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published by Cambridge University Press as David N. Gellner's scholarly study of Newar Buddhism's ritual hierarchy, peer reviewed university press scholarship. NotesDavid Gellner's scholarly study of Newar Buddhism's hierarchy of ritual specialists.
Citation
AuthorDavid N. Gellner
PublisherCambridge University Press
Publication Year1992
Source Typeacademic monograph
Connections
Associated With
This source names Kathmandu directly: "distinctive Buddhist tradition of the Kathmandu Valley."
Source Monk, Householder, and Tantric Priest: Newar Buddhism and Its Hierarchy of RitualDavid N. Gellner
This source names Newar directly: "Press book is his scholarly study of Newar Buddhism's hierarchy of ritual specialists, examining how monastic, householder and tantric priestly roles are organized within this distinctive Buddhist..."
Source Monk, Householder, and Tantric Priest: Newar Buddhism and Its Hierarchy of RitualDavid N. Gellner
This source names Theravada directly: "so a claim generalizing to Tibetan or Theravada monastic and priestly structures needs a source addressing those separate traditions."
Source Monk, Householder, and Tantric Priest: Newar Buddhism and Its Hierarchy of RitualDavid N. Gellner
Claims Backed By This Source (31 claims)
This source backs 31 claims across the atlas. As facts: 19 well-attested. As cited relationships: 8 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 3 holds.
- Cultures, 7 claims: 2 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
- Sacred Sites, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
- Cities, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.