Source
Mount Fuji (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
Wikipedia's article on Mount Fuji. Reliable for the mountain's 22 June 2013 inscription on UNESCO's World Heritage List under the name Fujisan, Sacred Place and Source of Artistic Inspiration, decided at the 37th session of the World Heritage Committee under cultural criteria iii and vi; for the inscribed area of more than 20,000 hectares with a larger buffer zone; for Fujisan Hongu Sengen Taisha, the shrine at the mountain's base dedicated to the goddess Konohanasakuya hime; and for the mountain's long standing role as a destination of pilgrimage and a source of artistic inspiration reaching back to the eleventh century. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Community-edited reference page, tier 3, on a well-documented World Heritage Site whose inscription date and criteria agree with the World Heritage Centre's own listing record below. NotesUsed for the exact 22 June 2013 inscription date, the site's criteria and reference number, and the Sengen Taisha shrine and its dedication.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
PublisherWikipedia
Publication Year2026
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Fuji
Source Typereference
Connections
Associated With
This source names Konohanasakuya-hime directly: "Wikipedia's article on Mount Fuji."
Source Mount Fuji (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
This source names Konohanasakuya-hime directly: "Wikipedia's article on Mount Fuji."
Source Mount Fuji (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
This source names Mount Fuji directly: "Wikipedia's article on Mount Fuji."
Source Mount Fuji (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (183 claims)
This source backs 183 claims across the atlas. As facts: 179 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Spread Events, 172 claims: 171 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Sources, 11 claims: 8 well-attested, 3 holds.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.