Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Mr. William Lilly's History of His Life and Times, From the Year 1602, to 1681

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

William Lilly wrote his own life story in 1668, in his sixty-sixth year, as a letter to his friend and fellow antiquarian Elias Ashmole, and it was published from the manuscript only in 1715, after both men had died. It is the primary source for the best documented episode of Lilly's career: his summons before a House of Commons committee on 25 October 1666, weeks after the Great Fire of London, to explain hieroglyphic images he had published in 1651 that were by then being read as having predicted it. Lilly records that he admitted making the images but denied having known in advance what dates they concerned, and that the committee released him. As Lilly's own retrospective account of his own defence it is a firsthand record and, for the same reason, not an independent one; it is read here alongside Ann Geneva's modern scholarly study rather than in place of it.

Facts
Citation
Author
William Lilly
Publisher
J. Roberts, London
Publication Year
1715
Written by Lilly himself in 1668, in his own sixty-sixth year, addressed to his friend Elias Ashmole; published from the manuscript only in 1715, after Lilly's and Ashmole's deaths.
Source Type
Book (memoir)
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Lilly's own account of his own interrogation and of the predictions he was interrogated over; a primary firsthand source and, precisely because it is his own defence of himself, not an independent check on it.
Notes
Lilly's own record of his 25 October 1666 appearance before the Commons committee investigating the Great Fire, where he stated he had made the 1651 hieroglyphs but had not known the dates they would be read against.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

London, Cities

This source names London directly: "1666, weeks after the Great Fire of London, to explain hieroglyphic images he had published in 1651 that were by then being read as having predicted it."

Claims Backed By This Source (11 claims)

This source backs 11 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Prophecies, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.