Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Wikipedia, "Munkar and Nakir"

Wikipedia, accessed 2026

A community-maintained tertiary reference on the angels Munkar and Nakir, directly examined. Its strength is naming specific orientalist scholarship (A. J. Wensinck, John MacDonald) on the angels' names and a specific list of early hadith sources; its limit is a Wikipedia community article rather than a specialist study, which is why it sits at reliability tier three. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Wikipedia's article on the angels Munkar and Nakir, consulted 2026-08-13. Useful here for al-Tirmidhi's priority in naming the angels, the named early hadith sources (Ibn Hanbal, al-Bayhaqi, Ibn Abi al-Dunya, al-Bazzar, al-Hakim al-Nishapuri, Abu Dawud), and A. J. Wensinck's and John MacDonald's scholarly analysis of the names.
Notes
Wikipedia's article on the angels Munkar and Nakir, consulted 2026-08-13. Useful here for al-Tirmidhi's priority in naming the angels, the named early hadith sources (Ibn Hanbal, al-Bayhaqi, Ibn Abi al-Dunya, al-Bazzar, al-Hakim al-Nishapuri, Abu Dawud), and A. J. Wensinck's and John MacDonald's scholarly analysis of the names.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munkar_and_Nakir
Source Type
reference
Connections

Associated With

This source names Munkar and Nakir directly: "tertiary reference on the angels Munkar and Nakir, directly examined."

Source Wikipedia, "Munkar and Nakir"Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)

This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Doctrines, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.

Well-attested

10

General References

2
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.