A community-maintained tertiary reference on the angels Munkar and Nakir, directly examined. Its strength is naming specific orientalist scholarship (A. J. Wensinck, John MacDonald) on the angels' names and a specific list of early hadith sources; its limit is a Wikipedia community article rather than a specialist study, which is why it sits at reliability tier three.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Wikipedia's article on the angels Munkar and Nakir, consulted 2026-08-13. Useful here for al-Tirmidhi's priority in naming the angels, the named early hadith sources (Ibn Hanbal, al-Bayhaqi, Ibn Abi al-Dunya, al-Bazzar, al-Hakim al-Nishapuri, Abu Dawud), and A. J. Wensinck's and John MacDonald's scholarly analysis of the names. NotesWikipedia's article on the angels Munkar and Nakir, consulted 2026-08-13. Useful here for al-Tirmidhi's priority in naming the angels, the named early hadith sources (Ibn Hanbal, al-Bayhaqi, Ibn Abi al-Dunya, al-Bazzar, al-Hakim al-Nishapuri, Abu Dawud), and A. J. Wensinck's and John MacDonald's scholarly analysis of the names.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
PublisherWikipedia
Publication Year2026
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munkar_and_Nakir
Source Typereference
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Munkar and Nakir directly: "tertiary reference on the angels Munkar and Nakir, directly examined."
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)
This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Doctrines, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.