N.T. Wright's The Resurrection of the Son of God is a major, closely argued historical monograph defending the claim that the bodily resurrection of Jesus is the best historical explanation for the rise of early Christian belief, built on Wright's extensive scholarly command of first century Jewish and Greco-Roman ideas about the afterlife. It is respected across the field for its historical rigor and comprehensiveness even by scholars who reject its conclusion, and that split matters: Wright's affirmative historical case for a bodily resurrection remains a minority position within mainstream historical-critical New Testament scholarship, most of which treats the resurrection as a claim outside what historical method can adjudicate either way, or explains the belief through visionary or other naturalistic accounts. Cite Wright as a serious scholarly argument for a contested conclusion, not as the field's settled verdict.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Reliability tier 2: a major scholarly monograph respected across the field for its rigor even where its conclusion remains a minority position within mainstream historical-critical scholarship. NotesN. T. Wright's scholarly study of the resurrection of Jesus in its historical and theological context.
Citation
AuthorN.T. Wright
PublisherFortress Press
Publication Year2003
Source Typebook
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)
This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
- Religious Events, 3 claims: 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Miracles, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Doctrines, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.