Richard Jaffe's Neither Monk nor Layman is a scholarly history of clerical marriage in Japanese Buddhism, tracing how Meiji-era state policy legalized what had long been an unofficial or quietly tolerated practice among Buddhist priests, and how that legal change reshaped the social and religious identity of the Japanese priesthood over the following century. Jaffe's authority rests on close archival work in Japanese Buddhist institutional records and state policy documents from a genuinely understudied angle of modern Japanese religious history. As a study focused specifically on the legal and institutional history of clerical marriage, it treats that question in depth while necessarily saying less about doctrinal debate over monastic celibacy within specific Buddhist schools, a related but separate line of inquiry readers may want to pursue further.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published by Princeton University Press as Richard M. Jaffe's scholarly history of clerical marriage in Japanese Buddhism, grounded in archival institutional records, peer reviewed university press scholarship. NotesScholarly history of clerical marriage and its acceptance in modern Japanese Buddhism.
Citation
AuthorRichard M. Jaffe
PublisherPrinceton University Press
Publication Year2001
Source Typeacademic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (29 claims)
This source backs 29 claims across the atlas. As facts: 20 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 2 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 12 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
- Religious Legal Instruments, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Denominations, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
Well-attested
20Religious Legal Instruments
Holds
3Religious Legal Instruments
General References
4Religious Legal Instruments
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.