Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Neo-Confucianism in History

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Peter Bol is a specialist historian of Chinese intellectual and social history, and this study traces Neo-Confucianism's development from the Song dynasty onward as a social and political movement as much as a philosophical one, working from the documented institutional and political record rather than treating Neo-Confucianism as pure abstract philosophy. That combined social and intellectual historical method is the study's real evidentiary basis. Use it for established facts about the historical development of Neo-Confucian thought and the institutions that carried it; a claim about a specific later Neo-Confucian thinker's own philosophical argument in detail needs a source focused on that thinker.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Peter Bol's scholarly intellectual history of Neo-Confucianism in China, tracing its social, political and philosophical development from the Song dynasty onward, published by Harvard University Asia Center.
Notes
Scholarly intellectual history of Neo-Confucianism in China, tracing its social and political as well as philosophical development from the Song dynasty onward. Use for established facts about the historical development of Neo-Confucian thought and its institutional context.
Citation
Author
Peter K. Bol
Publisher
Harvard University Asia Center
Publication Year
2008
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (157 claims)

This source backs 157 claims across the atlas. As facts: 103 well-attested. As cited relationships: 22 holds, 1 connected, 1 held Differently. Plus 30 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Historical Figures, 42 claims: 24 well-attested, 11 holds, 1 held Differently, 6 general references.
  • Articles, 30 claims: 24 well-attested, 1 connected, 5 general references.
  • Sacred Sites, 30 claims: 18 well-attested, 9 holds, 3 general references.
  • Figures, 18 claims: 14 well-attested, 4 general references.
  • Religious Organization & Structure, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Scriptures & Texts, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Doctrines, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Virtues, 3 claims: 3 general references.
  • Philosophical Schools, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Ages, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Empires & Polities, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Held Differently

1

Historical Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.