Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Wikipedia, "Neoplatonism"

Wikipedia, accessed 2026

A community-maintained tertiary reference on Neoplatonism, directly examined. Its strength is naming theurgy as a specific ritual mechanism rather than a vague mysticism and dating its last major hymnist, Proclus; its limit is a Wikipedia community article rather than a Neoplatonism studies monograph, which is why it sits at reliability tier three. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Bare Wikipedia community article, tier 3, matching this corpus's settled precedent for this source class.
Notes
Wikipedia's article on Neoplatonism, consulted 2026-08-13. Useful here for its description of theurgy, literally divine-working, as the rites the embodied soul performs to return to divinity, and its statement that the world is peopled by a crowd of superhuman beings, accessible to prayers and offerings, and for Proclus Lycaeus's dates, February 8, 412 to April 17, 485.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoplatonism
Source Type
reference
Connections

Associated With

This source names Neoplatonism directly: "tertiary reference on Neoplatonism, directly examined."

Source Wikipedia, "Neoplatonism"Wikipedia contributors

This source names Proclus directly: "and dating its last major hymnist, Proclus; its limit is a Wikipedia community article rather than a Neoplatonism studies monograph, which is why it sits at reliability tier three."

Source Wikipedia, "Neoplatonism"Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 10 claims: 8 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Prayers, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 holds.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.