Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Nicholas Culpeper (reference article)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Wikipedia's own article on Nicholas Culpeper, the herbalist and astrologer, is a tertiary encyclopedic source, cited here for his probable birthplace, consistent with the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography's own account; the existing astrology history source is a broad survey unlikely to give this level of biographical detail. Its strength is that it agrees with a recognised scholarly biographical reference. Its limit is the ordinary one for a crowd edited encyclopedia entry: fine for this checkable detail, not a substitute for dedicated scholarship on his herbal and astrological work.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Reliability tier 3: a Wikipedia entry, written and revised by unnamed volunteer editors, agreeing here with a recognised scholarly biographical reference, suited to this checkable detail rather than to his own herbal and astrological scholarship.
Notes
Wikipedia's article on Nicholas Culpeper, consistent with the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography's account of his probable birthplace; the existing astrology history source is a broad survey unlikely to give this level of biographical detail.
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Culpeper
Source Type
reference
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)

This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 16 well-attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Historical Figures, 11 claims: 10 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.

Well-attested

16

Historical Figures

General References

1

Historical Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.