Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Obscurantism vs Science: Behind the Milk-Drinking Miracle

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

T. Jayaraman's Obscurantism vs Science: Behind the Milk-Drinking Miracle, written in 1995 by a theoretical physicist at the Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, is a scientific institution researcher's critical analysis of the 1995 Hindu milk drinking miracle, explaining the phenomenon as an effect of surface tension and capillary action rather than a supernatural event. Its authority rests on Jayaraman's scientific training and his direct engagement with the physical mechanism involved. It is an advocacy essay written from an explicitly rationalist standpoint rather than a neutral academic study, and it should be read as one side's argument in a real public debate, not as a religious studies account of what the event meant to those who witnessed it.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
T. Jayaraman's Obscurantism vs Science: Behind the Milk-Drinking Miracle, written in 1995 by a theoretical physicist at the Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, the top tier reflecting Jayaraman's scientific training and direct engagement with the physical mechanism, notwithstanding that it is an advocacy essay written from an explicitly rationalist standpoint, one side's argument in a real public debate rather than a religious studies account of the event's meaning to witnesses.
Notes
A scientific institute's critical account of the 1995 Hindu milk-drinking miracle, The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, 1995.
Citation
Author
T. Jayaraman
Publisher
The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai
Publication Year
1995
Source Type
Essay
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)

This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Miracles, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.