Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Source

Operation Blue Star (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia

Wikipedia's article on Operation Blue Star, community-edited. Reliable for the settled dates of the Indian Army's assault on the Golden Temple complex at Amritsar, 1 to 10 June 1984, with the heaviest fighting on 5 to 7 June; the casualty figures are sharply disputed and the article states this openly, the government's own initial White Paper naming 83 security force deaths and 4,712 civilian deaths inside the complex against independent human rights estimates exceeding 10,000 dead in total, a gap this atlas names rather than resolves. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Citation
Author
Wikipedia contributors
Publisher
Wikipedia
Publication Year
2026
URL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Blue_Star
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
3
Community-edited reference page, tier 3. Used for the 1 to 10 June 1984 date range, undisputed, and for the casualty figures, which the event's own entry carries as a named government-versus-independent disagreement rather than one resolved number.
Notes
Used for Operation Blue Star and its violence against Sikhs.
Connections

Associated With

Amritsar, Cities

This source names Amritsar directly: "on the Golden Temple complex at Amritsar, 1 to 10 June 1984, with the heaviest fighting on 5 to 7 June; the casualty figures are sharply disputed and the article states this openly, the government's..."

Source Operation Blue Star (Wikipedia)Wikipedia contributors
Claims Backed By This Source (61 claims)

This source backs 61 claims across the atlas. As facts: 52 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Spread Events, 46 claims: 40 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.